According to Canon: The EOS C300 Mark III includes the same built-in five-axis electronic IS introduced with the EOS C500 Mark II that works with almost any lens, including anamorphic. DCI 4K is a future firmware update. This was a major reason why so many productions adopted an FS7 workflow. Canon’s new-ish full-frame sensor (also offered on the C700 FF) gives filmmakers a more detailed image, with an even shallower depth of field. With Canon EF lenses, though, you can combine electronic IS (note, it’s not mechanical IBIS like Sony alpha mirrorless cameras) with IS on the lenses, so I’d be more inclined to give this one to Canon. With the ability to record 5.9K RAW internally, the camera can record plenty of data for most productions. And what you get are: Both of these features are good to have, but don’t really contribute to food on the table. What you need to understand is both form factors have been around for a long time, and both work. I would rarely use the 6K at 2.1 MBps, cause it takes the 512GB card in 31 minutes, but surely there are people, who wouldn’t have problems with that, cause they have different needs. I may be slightly biased since I’m already a Sony shooter (although I do really enjoy using Canon cameras). The Sony FX9 is also a full-frame sensor camera with a 6K oversample for a final 4K output. The ability to record multiple channels and control them individually is important, especially for run-and-gun interview situations. Again, this is only relevant if you’re purchasing heavier lenses like the Sony 28-135mm f/4 G lens. But it should be blatantly obvious by now that the Sony FX9 and Canon C500 Mark II are meant for two different markets. Click below. God! Buy Canon Cinema EOS C300 Mark II Camcorder Body with Touch Focus Kit (EF Mount) featuring Super 35mm CMOS Sensor, 4K, 1920 x 1080 60/50i, 23.98/25p, 24p, Canon XF AVC H.264 Codec, EF Lens Mount, Dual-Pixel CMOS AF Technology, 4" LCD Touchscreen with Mounting Kit, 2 x 3G-SDI Outputs, 2 x XLR Inputs, 2 x CFast Card Slots, Timecode I/O, Genlock In & Sync Out, Canon Log 3 … For a lot of professionals, in this price point, usability is as critical as image quality. And even though the FX9 is less expensive, I think they’re both great values for the money. It depends on the lenses you are going to use it with. Add falling wood and more to your video with this comprehensive library of 80 impressive elements. *As of this writing. Internal 4:4:4 RGB 12 bit codec available for some frame rates World Camera Improved Viewfinder CFast cards New screen and handle Slow … When we start jumping outside of sensors and resolution, we begin to see the biggest differences between these two cameras. The new Canon C500 Mark II is a 5.9K full-frame cinema camera. The Sony FX9 was without a doubt, the most talked about camera on the show. With the Sony, you get the XDCA-FX9 Extension Unit: This puts both cameras on an even keel. From Sony: Comparison Canon EOS C500 Mark II vs Sony PXW-FX9. The handle is also much more solid than on the Mark I, as Canon clearly realise that it will be used with film lenses which are … Not many clients pay extra for 6K or RAW workflows. The C200 has them at the back but to the left, so you could still access it if you were standing on the operator’s side. The two most exiting camera just announced – Canon EOS C500 Mark II and Sony PXW-FX9! When I first entered the world of TV and Broadcast it was about 12 years ago. …handheld footage can be transformed with Sony Catalyst Browse/Catalyst Prepare software* in post-production to look as smooth as if it were shot with a gimbal. It’s a no-brainer, really. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. I definitely pick the Canon C500 Mark II here. You can make both cameras work, and it’s ultimately down to personal preference. The files output were also the easiest in post (post ready, no conversion). You could wire up a couple of interviewees, the interviewer and a backup and you’ll already be down four ports. I have collected the â¦ The new Canon C500 Mark II and Sony FX9 are bound to find their way onto sets and productions everywhere. The only way you can know is if you use it yourself for a while. Both the FX9 and C500 MKII came out at the end of 2019, making them the ultimate competitors in â¦ Dynamic Range Result of the Canon C500 Mark II at ISO 800 Please have a look at how we test dynamic range of cameras here . The latest FDTimes 96-page IBC-September Edition. The Canon C500 Mark II is definitely more expensive on paper. I mean, after all these years, why is it still even a thing?